The Meaning of Work

4475 reads

All people at the work place work, that is, do their job; but how often do we think of how our work is in alignment to the business goals and organizational vision of our company. The question is do we work for work's sake or are we focused on business.

Let me narrate an experience I had in trying to book a holiday with an agency and how two people in the same organization behaved in two different ways. We will also look at what my decision was as a potential customer, pertaining to the travel booking. Last month I decided to go on holiday to Hyderabad along with my family and called up a travel house to make a booking at one of the star hotels in the Ramoji film city. The person who attended the call, Anand (name changed) seemed to be in a tearing hurry to give the information to me and disconnect the call. He said there are two hotels in the film city, one a five-star and the other a three- star and when he last called them there were vacancies in both; but if I have to make the booking, I will have to visit their office with the cheque or cash; and the rider was I need to reach his office before the rooms got sold off. I tried to convince him that I have been a regular customer and that he can take the booking and I will make sure that the payment reaches him. He was however very clear that he can only make the booking once he get's the payment. I called him a couple of times later, to know the status and also in the process to convince him to accept my proposal. But he was very clear, straightforward and not rude. But at the same time didn't appear friendly or supportive; nor did he seem really interested in grabbing the business.

 

The  ultimate meaning of work should be not merely to be occupied but to increase business as much as possible.

 

 

In the mean time, I started my search on the internet for hotel bookings and got some real good weekend offers from star hotels in Hyderabad. However I thought of making another attempt to get a booking at the film city and again called up the agent; but this time around, I called another person Uma (name changed); as I remembered having contacted her for a holiday I had taken earlier. At the outset I found the approach very different, she did appear to have all the time to listen to me and offered to check out the availability of the stated hotels and she even went ahead and upfront offered bookings in other hotels in the city. Well, it was the same organization I called but the experience was definitely different, the feeling very good. Uma didn't wait for me to follow up, but was proactive and returned the call stating that the hotel booking was going chockablock; however she came up with some more resorts, which I was not keen; she hung up the phone stating that she will continue to follow up with the hotels in the film city. I went ahead and made another booking, and just an hour later Uma calls back, stating that there is a cancellation in the 5-star hotel at the film city and she is holding the call from the hotel for me to respond. I had to just say yes and the booking would have been made; buy then I had made another booking, so what I could do was just to thank her for the offer.

 

I had to quote this anecdote to drive my point of view of how two people in the same organization can view work differently; both for sure are dedicated employees and in fact Anand seemed to be more busy than Uma, but Uma acts like an ambassador of her company and she knows the ultimate meaning of her work, which is not merely to be occupied but to increase business as much as possible, to ensure that potential customers are not lost and to keep customers happy, and to ensure that they come back.

 

Having stated my view of Uma and Anand, I am not sure how exactly these two people are viewed and how their performance is rated. For all you know, all calls to this organization may be routed through Anand and he may be indeed on records getting more business for the organization; but how does one capture the missed opportunities and the loss of current customers returning with more business. That's probably the reason why Dr. Deming say's that Management by Objectives (MBO) which focuses only on results is no good. He goes on to say, "People operating under MBO will perform only enough to look good to their supervisor. They will avoid doing more". He says that the answer to this is Management by Planning (MBP), which focuses on process and not outcome.

 

We should be able to look at all the process under the Quality Management System and define the processes clearly and have regular audits to see consistency of process in the organization to meet the organizational goals. Surveys and customer feedback is yet another way by which management can identify gaps in the organization.  n

 

Pradeep Kumar E.T. A Master Black Belt in Six Sigma , is the Country Manager- Operational Excellence with Tyco Electronics Corporation India Pvt Ltd. Feedback can be e- mailed to pradeep@businessgyan.com

 

Issue BG83 Feb 08

Trending

72
johnsullivan's picture

Sourcing Is the New Recruiting

I have some excellent news for you. Sourcing is the place to be in talent acquisition today! Recruiting as it has traditionally been known is going away. Increasingly companies are adopting recruitment process automation, and that means that there
185
harvardbusinessreview's picture

How to Prepare for a Panel

Make sure to connect with the moderator beforehand.
201
johnsullivan's picture

HR Roundtable: The Value of a Multi-Generational Workforce

In the classic rock anthem My Generation by The Who, lead singer Roger Daltrey screams, “I hope I die before I get old.” He echoed a sentiment of the times, but he never knew that he was also doing what...
198
adamgrant's picture

Why Women Volunteer for Tasks That Don’t Lead to Promotions

Here’s a work scenario many of us know too well: You are in a meeting and your manager brings up a project that needs to be assigned. It’s not particularly challenging work, but it’s time-consuming, unlikely to drive revenue, and probably won’t be
217
johnsullivan's picture

How Personas Change Sourcing Outcomes

It’s really intimidating to walk into a room full of people you don’t know. We’ve all had that moment of panic, scanning the room for any semi-familiar face and praying it’ll work. Just one person. I personally hate that feeling....
302
misner's picture

Body Language When Networking

Body language can be a powerful attractant or deterrent when it comes to building relationships with others. People assess you visually within the first fewminutes of meeting you.  I’ve been asked a lot about body language by the media over the
231
adamgrant's picture

This 4-Day Work Week Experiment Went So Well, the Company is Keeping It

A first-of-its-kind four-day work week experiment in New Zealand has come to an end after two months, but the trial went so well the company actually wants to make the changes permanent.While lots of research has shown the numerous benefits a
253
johnsullivan's picture

What’s Wrong With Corporate Culture As A Management Tool? Almost Everything!

The top 15 most damaging shortcomings of managing using your culture It’s no secret that most in HR and many CEOs are enamored with “corporate culture,” which is essentially the “invisible hand” that helps guide the behavior of your employees....
227
sethgodin's picture

But why does it take so long?

The original book could take three years to write. Retyping the manuscript might take a day or two. Modern work isn’t time-consuming because it takes a long time to type. Physical constraints aren’t usually the gating factor, either. It’s not a