|
All people at the work place
work, that is, do their job; but how often do we think of how our work is in
alignment to the business goals and organizational vision of our company. The
question is do we work for work's sake or are we focused on business.
Let me narrate an experience I
had in trying to book a holiday with an agency and how two people in the same
organization behaved in two different ways. We will also look at what my
decision was as a potential customer, pertaining to the travel booking. Last
month I decided to go on holiday to Hyderabad
along with my family and called up a travel house to make a booking at one of
the star hotels in the Ramoji film city. The person who attended the call,
Anand (name changed) seemed to be in a tearing hurry to give the information to
me and disconnect the call. He said there are two hotels in the film city, one
a five-star and the other a three- star and
when he last called them there were vacancies in both; but if I have to make
the booking, I will have to visit their office with the cheque or cash; and the
rider was I need to reach his office before the rooms got sold off. I tried to
convince him that I have been a regular customer and that he can take the
booking and I will make sure that the payment reaches him. He was however very
clear that he can only make the booking once he get's the payment. I called him
a couple of times later, to know the status and also in the process to convince
him to accept my proposal. But he was very clear, straightforward and not rude.
But at the same time didn't appear friendly or supportive; nor did he seem
really interested in grabbing the business.
|
The ultimate
meaning of work should be not merely to be occupied but to increase business
as much as possible.
|
In
the mean time, I started my search on the internet for hotel bookings and got
some real good weekend offers from star hotels in Hyderabad. However I thought of making
another attempt to get a booking at the film city and again called up the
agent; but this time around, I called another person Uma (name changed); as I
remembered having contacted her for a holiday I had taken earlier. At the
outset I found the approach very different, she did appear to have all the time
to listen to me and offered to check out the availability of the stated hotels
and she even went ahead and upfront offered bookings in other hotels in the
city. Well, it was the same organization I called but the experience was
definitely different, the feeling very good. Uma didn't wait for me to follow
up, but was proactive and returned the call stating that the hotel booking was
going chockablock; however she came up with some more resorts, which I was not
keen; she hung up the phone stating that she will continue to follow up with
the hotels in the film city. I went ahead and made another booking, and just an
hour later Uma calls back, stating that there is a cancellation in the 5-star
hotel at the film city and she is holding the call from the hotel for me to
respond. I had to just say yes and the booking would have been made; buy then I
had made another booking, so what I could do was just to thank her for the
offer.
I had to quote this anecdote to
drive my point of view of how two people in the same organization can view work
differently; both for sure are dedicated employees and in fact Anand seemed to
be more busy than Uma, but Uma acts like an ambassador of her company and she
knows the ultimate meaning of her work, which is not merely to be occupied but
to increase business as much as possible, to ensure that potential customers
are not lost and to keep customers happy, and to ensure that they come back.
Having
stated my view of Uma and Anand, I am not sure how exactly these two people are
viewed and how their performance is rated. For all you know, all calls to this
organization may be routed through Anand and he may be indeed on records
getting more business for the organization; but how does one capture the missed
opportunities and the loss of current customers returning with more business.
That's probably the reason why Dr. Deming say's that Management by Objectives
(MBO) which focuses only on results is no good. He goes on to say, "People operating
under MBO will perform only enough to look good to their supervisor. They will
avoid doing more". He says that the answer to this is Management by
Planning (MBP), which focuses on process and not outcome.
We
should be able to look at all the process under the Quality Management System
and define the processes clearly and have regular audits to see consistency of
process in the organization to meet the organizational goals. Surveys and
customer feedback is yet another way by which management can identify gaps in
the organization. n
Pradeep Kumar E.T. A
Master Black Belt in Six Sigma , is the Country Manager- Operational Excellence
with Tyco Electronics Corporation India Pvt Ltd. Feedback can be e- mailed to pradeep@
businessgyan.com
Issue BG83
Feb 08
Related Items:
Capacity and Capability
CII-Institute of Quality Announces Six Sigma Winne
Compuware Announces Support for ITIL Version 3 Con
Control and Dominance
Investing behind successful entrepreneurs
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |