|
Slight
exaggeration, we must admit. But one that is quite effective on
conveying the role-played by a clear and well-drafted RFP (Request for
Proposal). RFP helps in getting the right vendor and probably the best
possible IT product, solution or service. Since deciding on technology
happens often in an organization’s lifecycle and its criticality is
high, we decided to devote an entire article to writing a good RFP.
What should a RFP contain?
A
good RFP should contain an accurate description of your organizations
technology (software, hardware and service) requirements in a clear and
lucid manner. If there is some technology infrastructure already
existing make sure you include that in detail as well. Finally, evolve
a set of transparent criteria based on which these short listed vendors
can be evaluated and the timelines. This is (as the experienced ones
will vouch for) easier said than done for each of these are complex
tasks. Now a small and timely clarification. It is advisable that a
detailed RFP be prepared and given only to vendors who have been short
listed. Later in the article there is a part devoted to short listing
of vendors.
GETTING THE REQUIREMENTS
Administer
a survey across the organization covering all the departments
identifying the workflow process and bottlenecks. Also try to identify
among all these processes which ones are critical interms of current
and emerging organizational priorities as well as plans. For example
the survey should be able to identify situations where employees spend
valuable time searching for, or correcting, data needed to complete a
given task. Some examples of this situation would be manufacturing
order entry on one hand, and document capture in a document management
system on the other. Many other examples exist.
The good thing is that this also helps you arrive at reliable estimates of potential savings and financial impact to be made.
SHORTLISTING OF VENDORS
It
is very time-consuming to review vendor respones to a fully detailed
RFP, attend lengthy software demonstrations, and compare all of the
proposed system features. One way to reduce this time drain is to send
all potential vendors a brief list of key questions (known as a Request
for Information or RFI) covering just the mandatory, “must-have”
features needed to satisfy your major requirements. You can then “weed
out” those vendors or products that do not have a close fit to your
needs, reserving your time to deal only with the vendors who submitted
the best 3, 4, or 5 responses to the RFI, i.e., those vendors are most
likely to meet your needs the best.
Coming
up with a list of “must have” mandatory issues can be done rather
easily using the information collected in the survey mentioned above.
This is also where system constraints can be imposed. For example, if
the new system must interface with an existing legacy system, or must
be used on an existing database, or must provide a certain key software
feature, that mandatory requirement should be listed here and used as a
means to weed out vendors who do not support that function early. Use a
quantitative, weighted grade point scoring system to determine the best
RFI responses.
Once
those vendors and products with the highest potential for being well
suited to your needs are placed on the shortlist, the task of preparing
a fully detailed Request for Proposal (RFP) begins. Overall, the RFP
must do two things - accurately communicate your organization’s needs
to vendors, and elicit vendor proposals with the least amount of
unplanned Q & A sessions from the vendors.
Accurately
communicating your organization’s needs involves much more than simply
presenting a series of questions regarding system features and company
history to each vendor. Why? A simple list, no matter how detailed,
provides no means of cross-referencing your organization’s goals and
procedural priorities with vendor responses to the RFP. In addition, a
simple list provides no means of enabling consistent vendor RFP
responses to be obtained, or analyzed and compared on a quantitative
basis. For best results, the questions found in a detailed RFP should:
1. be categorized by major organization business and procedural goals
2. be answered with clearly defined vendor responses
3. cross check each other to verify the vendor’s understanding of your unique needs (see legal benefits)
4. be directly related to the high level business procedures important to your organization
Obtaining
consistent vendor responses is extremely important if you want to
compare them to each other! If 3 different vendors answered a given
question with YES, NO, and MAYBE, what do you do with the MAYBE? How
can that vendor’s proposal be evaluated? All questions in an effective
RFP must be clearly stated so there is no vendor confusion, and they
must be worded to elicit a focused answer. Some tips are given below:
1. Use either YES/NO or multiple choice formats
2. In those cases requiring essay type answers, make the questions detail oriented
3. Electronic or Web RFPs must offer vendor input validation
4. Be sure options such as Not Available (NA) or Not Supported are clearly identified
Like
we suggested earlier, a detailed RFP should only be sent to those
vendors with the best RFI responses, 3 to 5 vendors at the most. This
is because of the time required to distribute RFPs to vendors, and the
need for one or more software demonstrations.
Manually
copying and assembling a Request for Proposal that is 20, 30, or 50
pages long is no easy task. But even this time-consuming task pales in
comparison with the daunting task of manually entering all of the
vendor responses accurately! There is no question that electronically
distributing an RFP to vendors, and receiving their responses back in
an electronic format that can be quickly merged into a database, is
needed! Be sure that the vendor responds to your RSP and does not add
more to it, If he does you will have to depend on him to later de code
it!!
(The
article was written by the businessgyan editorial team, with major
inputs from Shivaji SenGupta, a consultant and a Senior Professional.)
Issue BG8 Nov01
Related Items:
A guide to protect your Intellectual Property Righ
A ready reckoner and guide for potential entrants
A startup gets a boost
A Student for Life
A tale of today and tomorrow
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |