|
Excerpts
of a speech by John C. McCarthy, Vice President, Asia Pacific Research, Forrester
Research, Inc.
I chose the title "Midlife
Crisis in the BPO industry" because I felt it very appropriate, for some of the
angst that we sense has been going around in the industry.
There are a lot of high
expectations around BPO, but as the market has gotten older there's been a
frustration very similar to what you see in the classic white middle aged man
in America. The same thing today is true for providers and also some of the big
multinationals- the IBMs' and the Accentures.
There is a lot
of consolidation - a BPO acquisition or merger happening on a daily basis.
Those BPOs that have struggled to build momentum and get beyond the start up
mode are searching for the right strategy.
Future
success for BPOs will require serious technology and marketing investments. Not just for branding, but on aspects like, which
accounts are we going to target, which processes are we going to go after, how
are we going to articulate our differentiators, our value propositions and then
the technology investment? Over time the successful companies are going to be
those who offer black box solutions. (The customer just gets results and does
not bother about how the results are given).
From a survey we did in
November last year, asking companies to describe their level of interest in
BPO, we found that this was pretty consistent over the last few years. About
14% of the companies in North America and 15% in Europe are leveraging BPO
wherever possible. The good news is that a good percentage of the market is
untapped; the bad news is we've been at the same level for a very long time and
how to jumpstart the market is one of the key issues to get the momentum going
in the BPO space. Financial services, Utility, Telecommunication, Insurance
were some of the big birds that are driving BPOs.
Areas
where the BPO work is happening There is
huge range of processes, the biggest of which is payroll. Things like accounts
payable or receivable are relatively well defined simple transactions with
limited number of inputs and transactions which BPOs are taking on. However I
think these are just a small fragment of what is possible. Also outside the HR
area the BPO industry has not done much to have a significant momentum.
Have
we seen the savings which we've expected in a BPO? Comparing with data from 2002 - The percentage
of people who said that their savings exceeded their expectations is
significantly higher, so the value proposition story is getting proven. The
people who said that it was too early to tell dropped dramatically - this shows
the level of maturity, traction, and consistency that we are starting to get in
the industry. The people (customers) who said that they didn't get what they
expected probably didn't know how to cost them to begin with.
This is particularly
important because overall when we asked about the concerns people
have about outsourcing; -the top one is
cost effectiveness, followed by quality, security and loss of control.
We had offshore providers talk
about cost savings - Comparing with data
collected two years ago; the overall ratio of people who are very satisfied to
somewhat satisfied has gone up. There is a little bit of a drop in the people
who are very satisfied, when asked about the quality of deliverables.
I think taking into account the pressures of growth a lot more complex work is
being offshored compared to 2 years ago. So that has raised the expectations
about capabilities. Another aspect is that the Multinationals have started
setting up their own offshore centers and the notion that offshore is purely
the purview of the Indian supplier is going down. These factors have increased
the expectations of the customers and might account for a pretty significant
drop in the people who are very satisfied with the quality of the deliverable.
Security Breaches over the
course of last year, has impacted offshore BPO clients who felt overall loss of
control and security and that's why the initiatives that NASSCOM is leading for
employee registry etc. are particularly important because there is a fair
amount of angst related to offshore.
23% of the people said they
were extending their investigation and were putting even more rigor around the
orders that they were doing around vendor security practices, 10% were
revaluating their commitment to go offshore and 6% had slowed their migration
offshore. So almost 40% of the companies had slowed down what they were doing.
Even those that weren't slowing down were providing more oversights, were
looking at negotiating their SLA's, with more things in place around security,
a small percentage was thinking more towards a captive centre.
The
state of the market and how we see some of those investments playing out - First, the market is still fragmented; it's very rare
to find anybody who's got more than 50 clients overall and more than 10 or 15
clients in a particular segment. The industry is growing. We have seen higher
growth rates in segments like HR and F&A. HR has shown significant
consolidation and you have a series of players who have a broad range of
capabilities in terms of the different HR processes they can go after but also
in different skills in terms of process, consulting, technology, and
operations.
The
call centre business we feel has almost stopped dead in its tracks. The vendors are retreating and considering other
focused transaction processes.
The
delivery models are in flux, we see a lot
of large multinationals trying to figure out if they really achieved what they
set out to when they brought this business to this place. Companies like
P&G, HP, IBM are looking at how they can leverage the same sort
of capabilities to build momentum in other areas. Market consolidation is
accelerating, there's almost a deal a month. People are trying to build scale
and get out of that midlife crisis. They are asking ‘Where are we going to make
any money?' They think that they have to go after these huge deals and do the
transformations later, because they see that they can derive profits in those
large deals sooner than in the smaller ones.
There's
a little bit of a discast between the vendors and users. The systems integrators chase the big deals, the
clients don't necessarily want to go through the disruption of the big deals.
The Indian vendors are trying to build a solid set for scale and referenceable
customers, but the clients are skeptical.
The challenge we have is that the customers
don't optimize some of these BPO decisions in favor of the vendor's existing
platforms and processees. That makes it hard
for the vendors to prove and deliver on a consistent scale and a consistent platform.
Then there are people who think that the clients approach or the captive
approach is going to save the day. We've started to look at the capex space
over the last 2 months. From the interviews that we've done we find that a lot of the
captive organizations are struggling. One of the things we
see happening in the transition is that companies are not talking about thirty
verticals anymore, but about two or three sub-processees in a series of
verticals and that over the next 3 years verticals are going to be very
important.
From the evolution point of
view, if you look at the call centre space which is largely a body based
approach, and has very low barriers to entry. We are seeing a
convergence-the domain expertise which you're building up, the process
expertise, the technology which you bring will be of particular
importance, and that's
going to raise the barriers for entry.
In
the verticals we are seeing a parallel evolution
where people are starting on a very simple transaction centric
processees-things like mortgage processing, claims processing, with fairly
limited number of inputs & outputs. We're starting to see deals to build on
these strengths. You are going to see the IT firms saying that we've got this
suite of applications, which we can sell and underpin our BPO offering.
The
third stage of the market is a much more platform based approach with reliance
on the underlying technologies. This
is the engine that we see will drive long term profitability - a much
more differentiator approach. No one is asking what software you run, they are
trusting your process and systems and your economies of scale.
Some firms have started building their own platforms, so it's much more of a
technology play in parallel with some of the process and the labour play. This
is going to be particularly important because if we look at the pricing of
these BPO contracts, the pressures are going to be significant. If the client's
base level cost is US$100/- over a ten year life cycle of that contract,
we are going to see that price drop below thirty (dollars) over time, (a more
than two thirds drop).
This is going to take
people through different phases. We see there are three key elements in the BPO strategy -the
labor arbitrage, the process improvement and a common technology platform. Today, it's a few things that drive success,
particularly in the offshore space, it's the arbitrage and process
improvement-the six sigma discipline that people bring, once the technology
platform plays a part, the importance of these factors will be much more
limited. The (cost) arbitrage will play out because everybody has it, the
process improvement, the six sigma discipline and the desire to measure
outcomes will then be particularly important - the move for a common platform
is going to drive a scalable advantage over time.
Part of what's happening
outside of this BPO space is that services oriented architecture modular
approach, which will become the heart of the BPO solution.
There
are a range of benefits in this platform based approach. For the supplier, it allows them to get scale. The
one to many relationship, benefits the customer who escapes the cycle of having
to build these applications themselves , important from a low flat rate or a
low single digit IT budget growth point of view, and the customer gets access
to a common set of best practices in the platform.
This was a presentation
during the NASSCOM-ITES BPO Strategy Summit-2006 in Bangalore.
Tarachand Wanvari, a
consulting corres- pondent with Business Gyan and www.businessgyan.com.Looks
after the South India desk of http://indiantelevision.com. Feedback at
This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it
Issue
BG68 Nov06
Related Items:
A brief outline of various technology options avai
Animation: much ado about 'something!'
BACKACHE The bane of the back
Behind the brand!!
Benefits of Exercise
Only registered users can write comments. Please login or register. AkoComment © Copyright 2004 by Arthur Konze - www.mamboportal.com All right reserved |